Two Bakersfield Doctors who operate Urgent Care Clinics could soon find themselves in hot water with the California Medical Board after spreading misinformation on the Covid-19 virus. Dr. Dan Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi appeared on primetime shows two nights in a row and published a YouTube video indicating that based on their testing, Covid-19’s dangers were being overblown. The doctors, who are not epidemiologists held a news conference on April 22 to share their conclusions about the results of 5,213 coronavirus tests at their clinics, extrapolating their findings to the whole California population.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/29/health/california-doctors-coronavirusclaims/index.html
"Do we need to still shelter in place? Our answer is emphatically no. Do we need businesses to be shut down? Emphatically no. Do we need to test them and get them back to work? Yes, we do," Erickson said at the news conference.
Their comments were roundly condemned and their YouTube video was taken down pursuant to YouTube’s policy regarding suppressing misinformation regarding the COVID 19 crises.
"There is a lot to object to from a scientific point of view," Andrew Noymer, an epidemiologist, told CNN. He said one big problem is that the doctors made estimates based on their clinics' clients who were tested, not a sampling of the general population.
"What these doctors are doing is corrupting the process from the start to make it seem like they are doing an honest policy analysis," added Noymer, who is an associate professor of population health and disease prevention at the University of California, Irvine.
The video also prompted the American College of Emergency Physicians and American Academy of Emergency Medicine to issue a forceful joint statement on Monday calling the pair's claims "reckless and untested musings" that "are inconsistent with current science and epidemiology regarding COVID-19.
" Why should these Doctors be worried about the California Medical Board? Because there are rules against dishonesty and unprofessional conduct. And while their statements are not conclusive proof of either, based upon the opinions of their colleagues, a good case could be made that no reasonable Doctor would make such statements based upon the evidence and that such statements were at the very least misleading and at worst dishonest. Further, these statements tend to undermine public health practices in a pandemic and could result in more Covid -19 cases and bad patient outcomes.
Doctors have a right to free speech, but it is a qualified right. If one uses their medical license to spread misinformation that could be injurious to the general public, then they should not be surprised that such speech comes at the expense of their medical license. Further, even when such speech is not a sufficient basis for discipline, it can often trigger the Board’s scrutiny in other areas.
In short, the advocacy of bad medical information is unprofessional conduct subject to Board scrutiny. The advocacy and implementation of unproven treatments is both unprofessional and in certain cases medical negligence upon which the Board will act. So Doctors should always be circumspect regarding the information they put out to the general public. They should also be even more cautious concerning unproven treatments. Many a Doctor has lost their license after going down that road. Do not be that Doctor. (See also In re Dr. Michael Arata M.D. Case No. 800-2015-014936)
https://lymescience.org/michael-arata/
California Medical License Defense Lawyer